Another hottest day in the world record occurred on July 24, 2024, and a days-long heat dome in many areas of the country followed, caused by persistent high pressure that trapped the heat over those areas.  The effect of high heat is also causes increases in strength and intensity of hurricanes, typhons and other storms, as well as creating wind gusts and dry conditions that create wildfires, bleaching/death of coral reefs, changes in what plants can live in various zones, and many other environmental consequences.  What is often overlooked though is the effect of extreme heat on humans.  Heat is the deadliest form of extreme weather, killing more people on average than floods, tornados and hurricanes. 

Extreme heat was declared a health crisis that needs to be addressed in federal law and policies according to Xavier Becerra, Secretary of U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS), during a trip to Phoenix, where the temperatures hovered around 100 degrees.  People in the US are dying of extreme heat at much higher rates than in the past. And we are bound to see new daily records for daily global temperatures in future months and years.    Arizona is expected to experience up to 117 days per year over 100 degrees by 2030 and nearly half the days annually will be over 100 degrees by 2060.  The federal government wants to be part of the solution and to work with the states to provide relief from extreme heat.  Among other things, the federal government is collecting data that the states can turn to when they are in the path of the next heat wave, as well as helping employers inform workers when they are in the danger zone.

He encouraged Congress to pay attention to this issue so we can be prepared.  The Stafford Disaster and Emergency Relief Act (passed in 1988 and last amended in 2016) created a system for a presidential disaster or emergency declarations to trigger financial and physical assistance through the Federal Emergency Management System (FEMA).  But this system still appears to be focused on weather disasters such as flooding, heavy rains, hurricanes and extreme cold, and not on heat exposure and dealing with the increasing numbers of wildfires.  So HHS will be partnering with Congress and the states to look at what the Stafford should and can do to address extreme heat that is occurring.

For example, Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs has pointed out to Congress that federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program funds given to Arizona are less than one-half of 1% of the agency’s funds because FEMA is focused on providing heating relief from the cold and not the needs for cooling in extreme heat situations.

For people who do not have the option to avoid being outside in extreme heat, experts suggest working in the shade, as well as taking frequent breaks and drinking plenty of water.  Today there are no federal heat standards and few statewide ones.  Proposed Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rules would add federal protections for both outdoor and indoor workers.  Employers would be compelled to provide workers greater protections including shade, water and rest breaks.  U.S. Secretary of Labor, Julie Su, stated “Working people should not have to experience heat stroke. Heat illness and even death just to do their jobs.”  OSHA estimates that the proposed rules would cost $7.8 billion for employer compliance. But the cost to human life would be greater without the proposed rule, and the proposal would provide an estimated $9,179 billion in total benefits each year for avoided heat-related fatalites.”

(Sources:  Akron Beacon Journal – June 19, July 25, August 11, and September 4, 2024)

Yes, We Can!
How to talk about climate change to inspire action and fight despair

“Virtual” Fall Forum

Thursday, October 15, 2020, 7:00 pm

(Come at 6:30 if you wish to socialize in breakout rooms!)

Register for Zoom link:

https://forms.gle/5pJcLAZe4ttJZnur8

Flyer (PDF)

Climate change is a wicked problem that can easily feel overwhelming to an individual.  How can climate activists avoid downplaying the real threat without freaking people out?  How can we move people from apathy and despair to action?  Using insights from psychology and new research on the impact of COVID-19 on thinking about climate change, Dr. Frantz will provide concrete ideas for how to talk about climate change in a way that motivates action and fights despair.

Speaker, Cindy Frantz, PhD, is a social and environmental psychologist at Oberlin College. Cindy directs the Community Based Social Marketing Research Lab at Oberlin College, a collaborative research program among faculty, students, and staff to develop, test, and promote behavior change programs that reduce Oberlin College’s carbon emissions.

By Lorraine McCarty

More than 4 million people participated in a worldwide climate strike on September 20, including the estimated 250 to  300 individuals–from students to the elderly–who gathered at Risman Plaza on the campus of Kent State University, carrying signs and speaking about environmental justice for future generations. According to 350.org, the strikes drew the largest crowds ever, sending a collective message to elected officials and world leaders that swift climate action is needed now. 

The local strikers included Jeff Ingram and Doc, who played their drums to encourage people to stop and listen to the speakers, and Renee Zimelis-Ruchotzke, who encouraged speakers and singers to take a turn on the microphone.

Lila, a high school student, said that it was hard to think about the possibility that her children won’t have what we have now. She said that she can’t vote yet but is encouraging those who can vote to elect good leaders. 

Another speaker talked about the need for a new president and vice president. Other speakers talked about how corporations put profits over people when they should be putting people and the planet over profits. 

Jess, who works in the solar energy industry, said that people don’t need to burn anything to create energy. All that is needed, he said, is to connect to the sun. Jess noted, however, that Ohio has a dismal goal of 5% renewables, compared to 50% to 100% in other states.

A freshman fashion design student talked about the lack of  sustainability in the fashion and clothing industries. Other speakers encourage people to “be the change you want.” Kevin sang an original song titled “Garden of Dust,” which described possible consequences that people and the planet face with climate change. Other inspiring songs and chants were interspersed with the speakers.

Here are more photos from the local climate strike:

By Renee Ruchotzke

The past several months have been full of news about climate change markers (e.g., permafrost and glaciers melting, record-setting heat waves, flooding, crop disruption) that were predicted by climate scientists but were not expected to occur until decades from now. Yet, these events are not eliciting alarm beyond those of us who have already been paying attention. What is it about Western society that is preventing us from taking action?

Epsen Stoknes, a clinical and organizational psychologist from Norway, offers insight into human psychology that outlines barriers to taking action as well as strategies to overcome those barriers.

His first insight is that once people have a basic understanding of the facts about climate change, more facts do nothing to convince most people to change their behavior. Stoknes believes that five (at least) psychological barriers interrupt possible action and that all of these barriers have been purposely triggered by the anti-climate-change movement:

1. The impact of climate change is at a distance for most Americans. Until there is a direct impact on us or our close family members and friends, we can set climate change outside of our circle of concern.
2. We are averse to messages of doom and loss. Without an accompanying message of hope and possibility, we feel helpless and shut down our creative abilities.
3. Much of our lifestyle is complicit in contributing to the problem of climate change, yet we don’t want to feel bad about ourselves or our choices. This creates dissonance, which causes us to downplay our impact.
4. When we feel fear, guilt or shame, it’s human nature to downplay the cause of those feelings by avoiding, ignoring or engaging in other kinds of denial.
5. Our social location and identity help to reinforce our beliefs, mores and values. If we take in and adopt information that threatens this sense of who we are and to whom we belong, we risk losing our social position and our identity.

Stoknes then shares strategies to address and dismantle these barriers, including strengthening social ties and community connections, nudging and supporting better behaviors, keeping the messages understandable and pragmatic, using the power of stories, and finding ways to create feedback loops to reinforce preferred climate-friendly behaviors. A few sections of the book are his outlines for new story frames (which did not resonate for me personally), but the book as a whole provides a practical road map for activists who want to have an impact on people’s day-to-day behaviors.

We had a great turnout at the October 22 Fall Forum: Hope for the Planet: The Promise of Permaculture with Renee Ruchotzke.

Here are some resources from the Forum:

• Copy of the Slide Deck
• Permaculture Institute  www.permaculture.org
• Great Rivers & Lakes Permaculture Institute  www.greatriversandlakes.org
• Permaculture Design Magazine www.permacultureactivist.net
• Upcoming Permaculture Design Course:

Books:

• The Permaculture Handbook: Garden Farming for Town and Country by Peter Bane
• Gaia’s Garden: A Guide to Home-scale Permaculture by Toby Hemenway
• Permaculture: A Practical Guide to Small-Scale, Integrative Farming and Gardening by Sepp Holzer
• The Garden Awakening: Designs to Nurture Our Land and Ourselves by Mary Reynolds

Kent Sustainability Commission’s Ad Hoc Committee Makes Progress in Support of Paris Agreement on Climate Change

A recent commentary in the print media said that said all of the doom and gloom articles about climate change have left people feeling helpless and that the media need to focus more on what was being done by people, companies, and communities to combat climate change. The example given was about an Alaskan village that was disappearing because climate change has forced the village to move 9 1/2 miles over the past decade to find solid ground. While Kent isn’t facing something this dramatic, the city is being proactive and taking steps to do its part to fight climate change.

Kent City Council asked an ad hoc committee of the Sustainability Commission to develop a climate action plan for the city. The committee–two members of the Sustainability Commission members, three representatives of the Kent Environmental Council, two representatives of Kent State University, one representative of Davey Tree and support staff from the city– has been meeting regularly.

The city has joined ICLEI (Local Governments for Sustainability, which was founded in 1990 as the International Council for Local Enviro

nmental Initiatives). ICLEI is the leading global network of more than 1,500 cities, towns and regions committed to building a sustainable future. By joining, the city gained access to the ClearPath software, which is used worldwide to track greenhouse gas emissions.

The committee is representing Kent as one of 10 cities chosen to participate in a web-based, 10-week work session on how to complete a greenhouse gas inventory. Afterward, the committee will put what it has learned into action here in Kent, with the greenhouse gas inventory process expected to take 12 to 18 months. After baseline greenhouse gas inventory data have been collected, the committee will report its findings to the community and seek community input and then use that information help guide its development of a climate action plan.

–Lorraine McCarty